🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.